Calvary Episcopal ChurchPhoto of Bill Kolb
Memphis, Tennessee
September 5, 1999
The Fifteenth Sunday After Pentecost

"If your brother sins against you..."
The Rev. William A. Kolb

Gospel: Matthew 18:15-20

It seems that whenever we grow in our inner self, that growth comes
usually as a result of having to do something that is difficult and sometimes scary for us. Thomas Moore, in his book, Care of the Soul, put it best for me when he said, "Our soul grows in the cracks and crevices of life."

One of the most difficult things for me to do is to speak directly and honestly with someone who has done something that has caused me pain. But carrying it around inside, sometimes in the form of anger, diminishes me and puts a wall between me and the person.

A number of parishioners over the years have confided in me that they carry with them anger about pain caused them by a parent. Sometimes the parent is already deceased, but the emotional drain and feelings of powerlessness live on. Sometimes the parent is still alive but the person has never mentioned it to them.

I went for fifty years without ever sharing some strong feelings with my mother, Alice. Finally, on a visit to her home in Florida, I exploded with some of what I had been suppressing all those years. Needless to say, it was quite an eruption. But it was only some of what I needed to say. Only after my mother’s death in 1987, in therapy, did I deal with all kinds of feelings that had been a darkness in me for half a century.

This morning’s Gospel reading, based on an ancient Jewish practice for dealing with conflict, addresses this human phenomenon – our fear of telling the truth to someone who is important to us (obviously, if they were not important to us, what they say and do wouldn't go so deep). The text suggests that if someone has done us harm we should go talk to them. Of course, we need to be intentional about the spirit in which we do it. As St. Paul says, "speak the Truth in love." Another caution is that this kind of process be carried out with the utmost humility and self-searching, that we be careful before we decide that someone else needs to hear from us about what they have done. It is a fact that we all are imperfect and often have no justification for finding someone else at fault. Or, as Luke and Matthew both say, elsewhere, "Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?"

This kind of Truth-telling, going to the person and telling him or her of our pain and our perception of their part in it, has as its underlying agenda a yearning for reconciliation. Reconciliation is the focus. The responsibility for initiating the process of reconciliation falls in the lap of the offended
rather than the one doing the offending. If I have been "sinned against" then I must not let my hurt/anger fester but must go to that person to discuss it.

If I do NOT tell you that you have hurt me, then I prevent you from:
1) becoming aware that I'm hurt and apologizing for your action.
2) explaining the reason you did what you did (after all, I may have misinterpreted your action.)
3) changing your behavior (therefore you might repeat the offense).

Now we need to put this scripture reading in context:

First with regard to the three steps outlined, the reading says that we should go talk to the person and tell them the truth as we see it, about their words or actions that have caused us pain. The text goes on to say that if our private approach fails, then we should "take one or two others along with us, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses." And if that fails, to "tell it to the church"; which I assume means all the folks in that immediate community, community of faith, or community of family, whatever community the two are part of.

I have never before, to my knowledge, preached about this Gospel because I have a problem with steps two and three: to take others to witness my version of truth-telling, and perhaps to witness my brother’s defensive words in response, is to me a step that will surely increase the chance of
failure. And to take it to the whole community, in public, seems a bit much of an invasion of privacy, in addition to further hurting the chances for success of the process.

The other clarification is that we need to put the harshness of this teaching in perspective. By harshness I refer mainly to verse 17:"if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector," which is to say the person’s relationship from the
entire community is to be severed.

First, remember that Jesus spent a lot of time with Gentiles and tax collectors; in fact, He loved them. Secondly, consider the placement of this teaching: just prior to it in Matthew’s Gospel we read that God never gives up on a lost sheep; in fact, God goes after the one sheep and leaves the 99
others, and rejoices in the return of that one sheep to the fold.

And this morning’s text is followed immediately by Jesus being asked if his followers should forgive others seven times before they give up on the person, and he answers, "seventy times 7." The final word here may be never lose hope for reconciliation, and never be surprised who may respond. So we see that God is not, under any circumstances, going to ever give up on us.

Now let’s face the fact that to address a disagreement directly can be a very hard thing to do or to get someone else to do for themselves. It is so difficult, yet it is so much more powerful than going through a third person. It has a much greater chance of succeeding, and it holds the strong potential of turning a lemon into lemonade – that is, two people who bare their souls to the extent that reconciliation is born out of strife, may very well go on to be friends.

The fact is, however, that it is difficult and often intimidating and most of us shy away from it. But we may tell others about how we feel. And thus is born something else, known in the therapy world as "triangulation," in which a third party and perhaps more become involved. I don’t have to tell
you how divisive and confusing that can be.

Being a proponent of many psychological guidelines for healthy living and relationships, I cannot help but point out that speaking directly to the one who has hurt you is clearly the teaching of Jesus, as recounted in this morning’s text. It may be that Carl Jung, or whatever analyst came up with this, appropriated it from St. Matthew!

Let me share with you two stories of people who dared to do this very healthy thing: One day a parishioner asked to speak to me, and after we had found a time to meet, they said something like this: "I don’t know what I have done or said or what you think of me, but I have the distinct
feeling that you don’t like me or feel some hostility towards me." The fact is that I had never had such a thought or feeling about this person. My only thoughts and feelings were positive. And so I worked at making sure the person knew that I had only good feelings towards them. This is a true
story that produced at least three good things: one, the person knows that I am not thinking or feeling judgmental things about them; two, I have some feedback that perhaps my serious demeanor may sometimes be a problem for others; and three, I feel that this person and I can go forward on a more solid footing in the future.

The other story is about a parishioner who wanted the Church to take a certain course of action, which we were unable to do at this time. I had been the person they dealt with in the matter. After they learned of our decision, the person called and left a message for me, saying that their
feelings were hurt about the decision, but that they knew I was in the middle and they also knew they would be okay with it in a short time. Well, I found that message a piece of grace, because if I had been in that person’s shoes I might have been hurt, too, but many of us, when we are
hurt, express it as anger. This person did not express it in anger, which is always frightening to receive. This person’s message was one that spoke of an underlying desire to stay in relationship, with me and with their Church; the message spoke the truth with a spirit of love. As if that hadn't
been enough, the next morning I got another message, saying that after they had slept on the issue, they wanted to apologize for the prior message, that perhaps they were letting themselves be hurt too easily, and saying, "See you Sunday."

Although the power of that experience for me is the obvious agenda of this person to "do no harm" and to build up community, it is also an example of what Jesus says in this morning’s reading. They came directly to the one who had delivered the message that at first hurt them.

These are but two of the many, many success stories in healthy and caring communication that take place in this faith community daily. I think most of us who have learned to do it have learned by doing it the wrong way so many times that we had to learn! May we go on learning, as, as we do, may we also go on deepening relationships in love and trust. Amen.

Copyright 1999 Calvary Episcopal Church.

Gospel: Matthew 18:15-20
"If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens to you, you have regained that one. But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them." (NRSV)

[back to top]

 
     
 
 
Search

 

 

Copyright ©1999-2006 explorefaith.org