Spiritual guidance for anyone seeking a path to God. explorefaith.org

 

Explore God's Love Explore Your Faith Explore the Church Explore Who We Are  

Home
> What Are You Asking? -November 2006
 


Tom Ehrich
Tom Ehrich

 
   

What are You asking?

Pastor, Author and Speaker Tom Ehrich responds to
your questions about God, faith and
living spiritually

Send us your questions


 

NOVEMBER 2006


I guess in my Christian studies as a child I missed all of the brutal violence in the Old Testament. God tells the Israelites to kill every man, woman and child at one point. This makes me very angry. The God of Christ does not seem to fit with the God of Israel. I love Christ and want to be a Christian and follow the teaching of the New Testament, but every time I read the Old Testament, I get really angry. Please help me make sense out of all of this.

Both the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) and New Testament contain many voices. Joshua sounds different from Ruth; Amos sounds different from the Song of Solomon. Similarly, the Gospel of John sounds different from Matthew, and Hebrews sounds different from Romans. The reason is that each was written by a different person, at a different time, for a different audience and using a different literary style. They speak of the same God, but don't sound alike.

During the settling of Canaan, the Hebrews were in a constant struggle for survival. They saw God as their champion and asked God to smite their enemies. At a later time, Amos wasn't concerned about Israel's survival, but about their transgressions, and he demanded that they change their ways. The New Testament has its own violent language—read the Revelation to John—but on the whole, the message is more about Jesus than about establishing a nation and waging wars of conquest.

When you look at the Bible as a whole, you will see the full range of human experience, from giving birth to falling in love to earning a living to defending one's homeland to facing death. Every phase of life calls forth different voices from within us and, therefore, tends to yield different perceptions of God.

As you read the Bible, I encourage you to consider the unique voice of each book and to ask where, in your own life, that voice can be heard. You see, God speaks to you at every stage on your journey.

(Return to Top)


The Bible tells us that God will not test us beyond our means but will provide a way out for us, but experience and many, many instances in the Bible have shown that many Christians fail their test and forsake their faith. I am going through very trying times and holding on to that promise. I have thought that the purpose of trials was to drive a person closer to God, but God just loads on even more trials after that. Is that a loving God?

I encourage you to go back to Scripture and to understand, as the Psalmist says, that God is our help in time of trouble, not the cause of our troubles. People get sick, people have accidents, people suffer in warfare, people die—all this and more happens because life is difficult, not because God is loading trials onto our backs.

Rather than hold on to an idea that God won't “give you any more than you can handle,” as the saying goes, I encourage you to lift up your pain and confusion to God. I don't think it helps you, or is true to God, for you to be looking over your shoulder, waiting to see what agony God will cause next.

(Return to Top)


Do you think there is a danger in presenting the Bible to children using pretend characters, such as talking animals? When they learn that these aren’t real, will they think that Jesus was made up as well?

As I understand child psychology, children have vivid imaginations in their early years. Through imagining monsters and “things that go bump in the night,” they are able to deal with the normal fears of childhood. Maurice Sendak's books (e.g. Where the Wild Things Are) are a good example of this. As time goes on, children become extraordinarily literalist, wanting no more of make-believe. Then they become idealists and dreamers.

As each stage proceeds, children seem able to differentiate between real and phony. In fact, children probably have a better nose for sniffing out phoniness than adults do! I personally doubt that a child gets waylaid when a rabbit is shown wearing overalls and talking, or “Billy Goats Gruff” prowl beside bridges, or characters in a Bible story seem cartoon-like.

Besides, the Bible is filled with metaphorical language and exotic images. It's called “limit language,” that is, language that tries to talk about something (in this case God) that is beyond the limits of language. Thus, God is referred to as “rock” and Jesus as a “lamb.” Those images help us to understand who God is.

(Return to Top)


Where does it say we shouldn't eat pork?

The prohibition against eating pork can be found in Leviticus 11:7. Many Jews still observe this prohibition, but generally Christians do not.

(Return to Top)


Am I too young to serve God (I am 14)? Any Scriptures to help me?

God uses servants of every age, young and old. Jesus taught in the temple around age 12. When his disciples told children to stay away from him, Jesus said, No, let the little children come closer.

I hope you will ask this question also of your pastor. I imagine he or she will be delighted to learn of a young person who wants to serve.

(Return to Top)


Does God not send calamity to some population as judgment on their "sin," as in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah, and in the case of Nineveh in the book of Jonah?

Ancient peoples, including the Hebrews, believed that God caused all things to happen, especially storms, famines, earthquakes, floods and other disasters. They had no other way of understanding these events. They, in turn, felt their role was to appease the gods.

Three thousand years later, we know a lot more about how things work, and we don't need to blame God for natural phenomena or for the accidents of life.

We also know from the prophets and from Jesus that God's fundamental nature isn't judgment or punishment or vengeance, but mercy, compassion and forgiveness. We don't need to look at natural phenomena and ask what the victims did to offend God. Better for us to ask what we can do to help them.

(Return to Top)


Why is it important to be “in communion” with the Anglican Community and a part of the See of Canterbury ?

Good question, and one on which you will hear different opinions. While the position of the Archbishop of Canterbury as center of the Church of England has a long history, the Anglican Communion is a relatively recent phenomenon. It was created in the 19 th Century by several national churches that were offshoots of English settlements. Among them was the American Episcopal Church. The aim was to seek a certain unity in belief and practice, to provide for mutual respect of ordinations, and, more recently, to provide missionary support from First World to Third World—all without allowing Canterbury or the Communion to have any legislative or ecclesiastical authority over the 38 provinces. Thus, it is an advisory council, not a seat of power. The Archbishop of Canterbury has no authority over the affairs of any province other than his own.

One constant during its existence has been conflict, both among the constituent provinces and, as we see now in the Episcopal Church, within provinces. In those conflicts, one side or another sometimes sees a tactical advantage to be gained by appealing to the Archbishop of Canterbury for a ruling (which he generally refuses to give) or by holding up being in harmony with the entire communion as a primary and determinative value. The other side, of course, seeks no such rulings and sees no unique value in being in communion with national churches that have little in common with it.

The Anglican Communion today is dominated by provinces in Africa , which are growing dramatically. Those national churches, such as Nigeria and Uganda , are quite conservative in their moral theology. Conservatives in the American church look to them as philosophical allies and want American Episcopal practice in alignment with African conservatism. They regard the newly elected Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church as an obstacle to such conformity, because she is female. Others say Anglicans outside the US have no say in Episcopal Church affairs.

 

(Return to Top)


I am a believer in God and love Him dearly. I have had several preachers tell me that the disease I was diagnosed with several years ago does not require medication, although I have been taking the meds for ten years. I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder or manic depressive illness. Could you possibly give me any insight into this, as I have found no scriptures telling me that it is a sin to take medication for an illness such as this. Maybe there are.

Except in a few denominations, medicine is considered a necessary contributor to health. One turns to doctors for medical advice and treatment, and to preachers for spiritual guidance and pastoral care. Medication can be abused, of course, but, as I see it, under expert medical care, medication presents an opportunity for health and doesn't conflict with God's desires. After all, Jesus healed the sick, and the Christian community was the first builder of hospitals.

 

(Return to Top)


I was wondering what the connection is between the Episcopal Church and Universalism, if any. Is this church friendly and open to the teaching?

Major Christian denominations have tended to look askance at Universalism because of its belief that all humans will be saved, not just those who profess certain beliefs. Some consider it a heresy and argue strongly against it, even though Universalism is considered Christian.

The Episcopal Church has two teachings that seem relevant here. As expressed in the Catechism, found in the Book of Common Prayer, one says that “Our assurance as Christians is that nothing, not even death, shall separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” This suggests a broad umbrella of grace, much broader than that professed by some other denominations, close to the universalist view of every soul returning to God.

The other teaching is that sinners can be reconciled, through confession, and will receive the “assurance of pardon.” This belief is far from the teaching of other denominations that sin leads to death and eternal damnation.

At ground level, Universalism (and its merged state as part of Unitarian Universalism) tends to get along well with local Episcopal congregations, because they both tend to be concerned about justice and community service.

(Return to Top)



To learn more about Tom Ehrich’s writings, visit www.onajourney.org.

 


(Return to Top)


Send this article to a friend.

Home | Explore God's Love | Explore Your Faith | Explore the Church | Who We Are
Reflections | Stepping Stones | Oasis | Lifelines | Bulletin Board | Search |Contact Us |

 
  Search
Copyright ©1999-2007 explorefaith.org